|
2026-01 Rusty
Blackbird
|
Evaluator |
Date |
Vote |
Comment |
|
Jeff C. |
6 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
The description and images confirm the species. |
|
Max M. |
14 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Photos definitive, good documentation |
|
Keeli M. |
20 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Rusty edging on feathers, face pattern, and
description of observed gray rump support ID as RUBL. |
|
Bryant
O. |
5 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Nice photos of a female |
|
Kris P. |
23 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
The photos show lots of the definitive features
that are distinctive from a Brewer's or female Red-wing, and Matt added
that he saw the bird's gray rump. |
|
Dennis S. |
9 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Good detailed report, with several observers,
and good photos. |
|
Mark S. |
14 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Photos are definitive. |
|
David
W. |
5 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Photos clearly show a female-type Rusty
blackbird in winter plumage. The amount of contrast in the face patterning
and the buffy/rusty edging to wing feathers is outside the range for the
similar immature Brewer's blackbirds. Also, the description of the gray
rump is very compelling. |
|
Kevin
W. |
16 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Combination of light-colored eye, contrasty
supercilium, rusty wing-feathers, and gray rump indicate Rusty Blackbird. |
2026-02
Vermilion Flycatcher
|
Evaluator |
Date |
Vote |
Comment |
|
Jeff C. |
12 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Descriptions and photos confirm Vermilion
Flycatcher |
|
Max M. |
14 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Nice photos and documentation |
|
Keeli M. |
20 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Would have preferred at least a mention of how
SAPH was eliminated, but photos show a female VEFL. |
|
Bryant
O. |
14 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Not sure why VEFL show up at Utah Lake every
year but they have been lately. This looks like a HY male? Good Photos. |
|
Kris P. |
23 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Strong documentation, particularly 2026-02. |
|
Dennis S. |
9 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Submitted photos and prior hotline photos leave
no doubt. |
|
Mark S. |
14 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Photos show adult female Vermilion Flycatcher. |
|
David
W. |
8 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Honestly, he had me at "Vermie." The rest
was just gravy. |
|
Kevin
W. |
23 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Photo shows a cute little Vermilion Flycatcher. |
2026-03
Bronzed Cowbird
|
Evaluator |
Date |
Vote |
Comment |
|
Jeff C. |
27 Jan 2026 |
To 2nd |
I've seen only a few Bronzed Cowbirds in
Arizona. They are strikingly different from other blackbirds when I've
seen them in the field, but the image, and its cropped versions, that we
have with this record obscure some important traits. The description and
What appears to be a thick-based bill are intriguing to me, but the head
size and shape don't seem to eliminate other blackbird species from what I
can discern from the images. The crown appears slightly elongated, but
that may be impacted by the bird stretching the head forward and downward.
I don't think that I'm seeing a ruff on the neck. I'm not sure that I'm
seeing the iris of the bird in the images. It almost appears like a lid or
nictitating membrane may be covering it, so I'm not able to confirm the
red that was described in the written record. Tail shape is not
discernable in the image. I'm not sure what to make of one blue spot near
a shoulder. The record indicates that blue could be seen on the wing of
the bird even in the shade, but I'm not really seeing that in the image we
have been presented. I'm not confident that I'm seeing a Bronzed Cowbird,
but I'm also hesitant to say no to the ID outright. This is likely the
first time I'm voting to send a record to the second round for further
discussion, but I'm currently leaning away from the Bronzed Cowbird ID. |
|
Max M. |
14 Jan 2026 |
To 2nd |
I have some concerns with this record. The
single photo is oversaturated and very poor quality. While the write-up is
decent, they tend to ID birds from photos after the fact and I am
concerned that is the case with this record, despite noting field marks
"in the field". With the oversaturation there does appear to be a blue
iridescence on the back, the eye appears brownish? or reddish but doesn't
seem quite right for Bronzed Cowbird. Are we seeing the eye or the
nictitating membrane? It also seems odd that the head looks like an
umbrellabird, maybe distortion from the photo? I also find it concerning
that the record was submitted 10 days after the observation. Is it
possibly a Bronzed Cowbird? Possibly but I am not confident we can rule
out other species. |
|
Keeli M. |
14 Feb 2026 |
Acc |
Picture are a little tough but they do show bird
does not have a light eye, and they show what could potentially be a blue
flash in the wing. Based on description of observed characteristics,
accepting this record. |
|
Bryant
O. |
14 Jan 2026 |
No, ID |
Interesting Blackbird, but inconclusive looks.
I'm not seeing any red in the eye, in fact it looks like the eyelid is
closed in the photo. Odd he didn't even consider a Red-winged Blackbird,
which was not eliminated and has all the field marks described. Its not
uncommon for the red to not show. BRCO has not been proven here. |
|
Kris P. |
26 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
I think the observer made the most of his brief
and limited view. The field sketch is very helpful given how strong the
impression of the blue iridescence was, but the photo didn't capture it
well. The bird's bill and forehead shape is very convincing. I'm not
troubled by the eye not appearing red. A bright red eye is that of a
breeding male, but a non-breeding male might have a more subdued
orange-brown iris and the low light of the photo might not have picked
that up. I wish he had included a comment about observing the eye color,
but nevertheless, this is a well-documented record. |
|
Dennis S. |
21 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Very detailed written report. The description of
unique characteristics and comparisons with other blackbirds was thorough
and narrowed the decision to accept. The drawing was unique. The photos
didn't add much! |
|
Mark S. |
14 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Detailed description seems to rule out
similar species. I wish the eye were visible in the photo, but the bird
appears to be blinking. However, everything in the photo is consistent
with Bronzed Cowbird. |
|
David
W. |
14 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Compelling and very thorough writeup.
Discussions of structure and color all point to this species. |
|
Kevin
W. |
23 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
I wish the photo was better, but it does show
the distinct large bill. The description in the submitted report also
indicates it had a red iris, something I would hope since the photo
doesn't show it (maybe his eye was closed?). The glossy blue wings also
are good for Brown-headed. |
2026-04
Tennessee Warbler
|
Evaluator |
Date |
Vote |
Comment |
|
Jeff C. |
15 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
The description lines up well with a first-year
Tennessee Warbler with a bit more white on the underside. Similar species
are sufficiently eliminated. |
|
Max M. |
29 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Nice write-up eliminating similar species. |
|
Keeli M. |
14 Feb 2026 |
Acc |
Observer's description hits the key points of
identification that rule out other species. |
|
Bryant
O. |
16 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Description hits all the field marks for a TEWA.
I'm curious of the age listed as immature male? Fall immatures and females
are probably not IDable unless captured. |
|
Kris P. |
26 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Lots of good ID points here, especially the bill
impression, face pattern, white under-tail coverts, and significant
differences from the Orange-crowned present. KC's long observation of the
bird through his camera lens in the attempt to capture a photo puts him in
a good position to suggest this might be the same bird depicted later in
2025-65. |
|
Dennis S. |
21 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Even with the late entry the written report is
convincing enough to accept the record. The 4 hour effort spent in the
area trying to get a photo but only observing the bird multiple times was
impressive! |
|
Mark S. |
16 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Excellent description and detailed analysis
establishes the i.d. - all important features were seen and noted. |
|
David
W. |
15 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Not quite sure what some of the eye arc
description might have been about, so I will not address it here. But
other than my confusion about that, the description sounds like a
Tennessee warbler to me. In addition, the observer is a good and
experienced birder who found many of the rare birds credibly reported in
Utah in 2025. |
|
Kevin
W. |
23 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
I feel that the description is good for a
Tennessee Warbler; especially the white vent. |
2026-05
Mexican Duck
|
Evaluator |
Date |
Vote |
Comment |
|
Jeff C. |
16 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
This appears to be the same individual that was
confirmed by the UBRC in 2022. That duck was observed in January as well
in essentially the same location (Record 2022-01). If not the same bird,
it is essentially identical in its key traits. I am voting to accept this
record based on the criteria that have been applied to previous MEDU
records by The Committee. I'll share some additional thoughts in case we
go to a second round. BirdsoftheWorld.org indicates that MEDUs are about
10% smaller than Mallards. This one is noticeably larger based on
checklist images showing the bird next to wild Mallards. I made the same
assessment when I observed our current duck in the field. As the volunteer
eBird reviewer for Utah County, I saw numerous images of this individual
before this record was submitted. The bent tail feathers and what appeared
to be a darkish rump caught my attention, but when I explored the species
in eBird, I noticed that eBird's featured MEDU photo by Ryan O'Donne
ll (a former UBRC member) was an exact match to our bird, right down to a
couple of slightly bent tail feathers and what can look like a darkish
rump under certain lighting conditions. There appears to be some tolerance
for slight tail curl/bend for MEDU. Here's the link to the image from the
Macaulay Library:
https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/46186291
Photo C of this record lines up well with the eBird's featured image of
MEDU.
In proper lighting, the pale fringed rump feathers are visible (See Photos
C and D). Photo D shows the broader blue band and thinner white outer
bands expected for a MEDU speculum. |
|
Max M. |
29 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Well documented bird |
|
Keeli M. |
16 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
This bird looks good for a MEDU. No white or
curl in tail, clean demarcation between paler head and reddish brown body. |
|
Bryant
O. |
16 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Looks mostly pure, rump a little dark but that
could be some lighting issues. Tail brown without prominent curl. Probably
has a Mallard somewhere in its ancestry but so do most ducks |
|
Kris P. |
26 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
I'm not sure what happened to the Species
elimination narrative, but the hybrid elimination in the Field Marks
section is strong and the photos are outstanding. |
|
Dennis S. |
15 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Most birders of Utah and Salt Lake County have
seen this bird and there's no question concerning ID. |
|
Mark S. |
16 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Excellent documentation. The photos show classic
Mexican Duck features, with none showing signs of a hybrid - a rare,
phenotypically "pure" individual for Utah. |
|
David
W. |
21 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
Excellent writeup and photos. This is about as
Mexican a duck as we ever get here in Utah. The breast color (and lack of
contrast with the flanks), tail color, speculum color, bill color, head
contrast, lack of green in head, and lack of significant tail curl all
point to Mexican duck. Nice record. |
|
Kevin
W. |
23 Jan 2026 |
Acc |
I think this bird shows enough traits to
be considered a Mexican Duck: Yellow bill, distinct line of color-change
from head to neck, no real curly tail feathers, dark undertail coverts
with no white. |
|